AusSMC policy on selection of experts
Introduction
Scientific Expertise
Suitability
Declaring Interests
Availability
Review
The AusSMC’s role is to make the results of evidence-based research available to everyone via the media. Being evidence-based is paramount. The AusSMC’s activities inform and sometimes trigger debate, but are not intended to endorse particular policies or boost the profile of specific individuals or organisations.
The AusSMC has a clear policy on who it approaches for scientific and related expertise
Scientific Expertise
Peer Review
The peer-review process of leading scientific and health journals ensures that the quality of the investigation is such that it is worthy of consideration by the wider community.
The peer-review process used by leading scientific and health journals provides a standard accepted by the scientific community by which the reliability of both investigations and researchers are judged.
- The AusSMC will use peer-reviewed publication in the relevant area of science and health as the basis for defining the expertise of scientists.
Expertise outside of peer-review
Some scientific research may be newsworthy while it is being performed (for example, a longitudinal study over several years, research into a topical issue, the discovery of a rare species etc) and before it has been reported in scientific journals, making the application of peer-review impossible at that stage of the research.
Similarly, in some disciplines, particularly those within the social sciences, arts and humanities (eg science communication), publication in peer-reviewed journals is less applicable.
In such cases, the AusSMC will consider:
- the reputation of the expert’s institute or academic department;
- the professional qualifications and previous track record of the expert;
- the expert’s current role as an active practitioner in his or her field; and
- the expert’s professional reputation within his or her field (judged by, for example, the number of significant awards and grants won).
The credentials of experts may be further assessed by consultation with other experts in the relevant field or, where appropriate, with the AusSMC’s Science Advisory Panel.
When the expertise of an individual is questioned, the AusSMC will refer final decisions on the credibility and suitability of that expert to the appropriate member of the Science Advisory Panel.
In general, the AusSMC will not utilise experts working for specific lobby groups (such groups normally have strong mechanisms to promote their message to the media). Known affiliations or interests of scientists will be clearly stated where possible.
Availability
The availability of experts within the media’s time frame may be a major determinant of which experts are put forward by the AusSMC.
This policy will be reviewed and updated from time to time.
If you have questions or feedback on our choice of experts please feel free to email us.